Search for: "Smith v. Autozone, Inc." Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
Falk (Property, intangible) TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of “A BRAND NAME LAW FIRM,” finding double entendre argument unappealing (TTABlog) Fame propels AUTOZONE to TTAB 2(d) victory in DENT ZONE cancellation: AutoZone Parts v Dent Zone Companies (TTABlog) TTAB affirms genericness refusal of FIREPOT for … guess what? [read post]